Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. BRIAN MITCHELL CHASE, Appellant.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Defendant's sole assignment of error is that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and due process of law in violation of the Oregon and United States Constitutions. As we noted in State v. Robinson, 25 Or. App. 675, 550 P.2d 758 (1976), that question can be properly resolved only in a post conviction proceeding (ORS 138.510- 138.680) in which evidence can be adduced at a hearing. Although we indicated in Robinson, as well as in subsequent cases (e.g., State v. Henley, 31 Or. App. 109, 569 P.2d 58 (1977)), that there may be rare instances where this issue may be raised on direct appellate review, we have been cited to no such case in which we found that rare instance; we conclude that this case is not one of them, and do not consider the question.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CHASE
(Mar 16, 1981)