Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROBINSON et al. v. THE STATE.

BANKE, Judge.

The appellants, Antonio Robinson and L. C. Gibson, were convicted of armed robbery. On appeal, their sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. Held:

The evidence presented by the state was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the appellants guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560) (1979). The conflict between the appellants' version of what happened and that of the state's witnesses was for the jury to resolve. See Jones v. State, 147 Ga. App. 296 ( 248 S.E.2d 557) (1978); Bradham v. State, 148 Ga. App. 89 (1) ( 250 S.E.2d 801) (1978).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

DECIDED MARCH 18, 1981.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROBINSON v. STATE
(Mar 18, 1981)