Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

The People of the State of Colorado v. Frank P. Romero

CHIEF JUSTICE HODGES delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant-appellant, Frank P. Romero, appeals the trial court's judgment denying his post-conviction Crim. P. 35 motion. He argues that he is entitled to be resentenced under the 1977 version of the amendatory legislation of H.B. 1589, Colo. Sess. Laws 1977, ch. 216, at 861. Specifically, the appellant asserts that the Governor's action to delay the effective date of this legislation constituted lawmaking by the executive branch in violation of the separation of powers doctrine, and therefore the bill became effective without delay on July 1, 1978. This argument was rejected in People v. McKenna, 199 Colo. 452, 611 P.2d 574 (1980), which has consistently been upheld. E.g., People v. Lopez, 624 P.2d 1301 (Colo. 1981); People v. Scott, 200 Colo. 402, 615 P.2d 35 (1980); People v. Cunningham, 200 Colo. 303, 614 P.2d 886 (1980); People v. Foster, 200 Colo. 283, 615 P.2d 652 (1980); People v. Cameron, 200 Colo. 279, 613 P.2d 1312 (1980); People v. Triggs, 200 Colo. 107, 613 P.2d 317 (1980); People v. Warren, 200 Colo. 110 612 P.2d 1124 (1980).

The judgment is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. ROMERO
(Apr 6, 1981)