Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BARBER v. THE STATE.

QUILLIAN, Chief Judge.

The defendant, Morris Barber, appeals from his conviction of theft by receiving stolen property. Held:

Neither an enumeration of errors nor a brief were filed in this case, and our Order to File, under Rule 14 of this Court, has been ignored. Nevertheless, our review of the record and transcript convinces us that no prejudicial error was committed in the trial court, and the evidence introduced was sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact that all the essential elements of the offense of theft by receiving stolen property were established beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560).

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J. and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED APRIL 7, 1981.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARBER v. STATE
(Apr 7, 1981)