AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

VERONICA REILLY, Appellant, v. HOLLIS SHAW et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review a determination of the respondents terminating petitioner's employment, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated April 28, 1980, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. There was substantial compliance with 4 NYCRR 4.5 (i) (now 4 NYCRR 4.5 [a] [5] [iii]). (See Matter of Covelli v Luger, 37 A.D.2d 1042; Matter of Rosenberg v Wickham, 36 A.D.2d 881. ) Moreover, the record reflects that respondents acted in good faith when they terminated petitioner's employment. Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REILLY v. SHAW
(Apr 13, 1981)