FURUSETH v. LOWE

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 79-1150.

Attorney(S)

For the petitioner there was a brief (in court of appeals)
oral argument by Alvin L. Woodmansee of
For the appellant there were briefs (in court of appeals) by Janet A. Jenkins
Bosshard, Sundet Associates,
oral argument by John H. Schwab, Jr., all of La

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 79-1150.

Attorney(S)

For the petitioner there was a brief (in court of appeals)
oral argument by Alvin L. Woodmansee of
For the appellant there were briefs (in court of appeals) by Janet A. Jenkins
Bosshard, Sundet Associates,
oral argument by John H. Schwab, Jr., all of La

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Dean H. FURUSETH, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Virgil M. LOWE, Defendant-Appellant.

(Dismissing 96 Wis.2d 736, 293 N.W.2d 182.)

STEINMETZ, J.

The court improvidently granted a review of the court of appeals decision in this case. When examined, the facts and record failed to present the issues the court anticipated when granting the review.

By the Court. — The review of the decision of the court of appeals is dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Dean H. FURUSETH, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Virgil M. LOWE, Defendant-Appellant.

Comments