Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

LEONARD ROTHMAN AND MILDRED ROTHMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF HACKENSACK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The Tax Court affirmed tax assessments by the county board of taxation affecting appellants' real property in Hackensack as follows: PARCEL I — 1978 only Block Lots Land Improvements 100F 8, 9, 10 $ 20,000 -0- PARCEL II — 1978 and 1979 Block Lots Land Improvements 114A 1 $138,000 $100 114C 1 — A and 3 95,400 -0- According to appellants-taxpayers, their appeal is limited to the Tax Court judgment relating only to Parcel II for the years 1978 and 1979.

We have considered the arguments advanced by the taxpayers on this appeal in the light of the proofs and applicable law. We have concluded that there is sufficient credible evidence in the record to support the Tax Court judge's determinations and that all issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(1)(A), (E).

We affirm the judgment substantially for the reasons given by Judge Simpson in his written opinion of August 26, 1980.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROTHMAN v. HACKENSACK
(Jun 16, 1981)