Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. KENNETH SANCHEZ.

KLIEBERT, Justice Ad Hoc.[fn1] [fn1] Judges Redmann and Kliebert of the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, and Judge Cutrer of the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, participated in this decision as associate justices ad hoc, joined by Justices Calogero, Dennis, Blanche and Lemmon.

Defendant, Kenneth Sanchez, was charged by bill of information with simple burglary of an inhabited dwelling in violation of La.R.S. 14:62.2. He was tried by a judge, convicted, and sentenced to serve two years at hard labor in the state penitentiary. Defendant appeals.

Although the defendant submitted two assignments of error to the trial court, assignment one has not been briefed or argued and is, therefore, deemed abandoned. State v. Gardette, 352 So.2d 212 (La. 1977); State v. Phillips, 337 So.2d 1157 (La. 1976).

The second assignment of error requests only that we review the entire record in this matter for error patent on the face of the record pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. Art. 920(2). We find no such error.

Accordingly, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.

REDMANN, J. Pro Tem., dissents with reasons.

[6] REDMANN, Justice Pro Tem., dissenting.

This Court is unconstitutionally constituted and an accused is denied due process of law by his or her case's being referred to it instead of the Louisiana Supreme Court as constituted by La.Const. Art. 5 §§ 1, 3 and 4, to which this Court should order this case referred.

[EDITORS' NOTE: DISSENTING OPINION CAN BE FOUND AT 403 So.2d 1157, 1161.]

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SANCHEZ
(Jun 22, 1981)