AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARIANO S. FALCON, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CROSS-APPELLANT, v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF THE SOUTHWEST, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CROSS-APPELLEE.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:

The judgment of this Court in this case having been vacated by the Supreme Court 101 S.Ct. 1752, and remanded for further consideration in light of Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. ___, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d ___ (1981), the case is now remanded to the District Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with Burdine.

The Court did not deal with that part of our prior judgment that decided or remanded non- Burdine issues for further consideration of the trial court. We, therefore, reinstate Parts IV and V of our original opinion.

REMANDED.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

It appearing that in our Order of May 29, 1981, we did not fully specify our non- Burdine issues, we now amend the last sentence of that Order to read as follows:

We, therefore, reinstate parts I, II, IV, V and VI of our original opinion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FALCON v. GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF S.W
(Jun 24, 1981)