Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BLANKENSHIP v. THE STATE.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals on the general grounds his conviction of the offense of robbery. We affirm.

The victim of the robbery identified defendant as the perpetrator of the offense charged. Although the evidence presented against defendant was not overwhelming, it was nevertheless sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the offense charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560)

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

DECIDED JUNE 25, 1981.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BLANKENSHIP v. STATE
(Jun 25, 1981)