Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Janet M. OSTROOT, Appellant.

OTIS, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty of theft of over $150, Minn.Stat. § 609.52, sub. 2(1) and 3(2) (1980). She was sentenced to five years in prison and placed on probation for three years, conditioned on her reimbursing the public defender for representing her.

Issues raised by defendant in this appeal relate to the sufficiency of the evidence and the correctness of the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress eyewitness identification testimony on due process grounds.

The state's evidence was substantially identical to that adduced at the separate trial of her codefendant whose conviction we affirm in State v. Crain, 306 N.W.2d 891 (Minn. 1981). The issues she raises are sufficiently addressed in the opinion we render in the Crain appeal.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. OSTROOT
(Jun 26, 1981)