Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARY DAVIS AND JACK DAVIS, HER HUSBAND, APPELLANTS, v. MOLLIE MANDAU, BILLY H. BRYANT, PAUL F. DICKEN, ROCKS STONES, INC., BIFF-BURGER OF CLEWISTON, INC., NATIONAL BIFF-BURGER, CLEWISTON BUILDERS, INC., SWINDLE BROS. DRAGLINE PAVING, AND DONALD R. EVANS D/B/A EVANS PLUMBING SUPPLY CO., APPELLEES.

DANAHY, Judge.

We find no error in the entry of the summary judgments for appellees in this case. For the reasons set forth in Beattie v. Brotz, 391 So.2d 802 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), we reverse the cost order in favor of appellee Evans to the extent that it taxes the costs of copies of depositions.

Pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(4), Florida Constitution, and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.030(a)(2)(A)(iv), we certify this decision as being in direct conflict with the decisions of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Sampaio, 374 So.2d 617 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Moore v. Caughey, 368 So.2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); County of St. Lucie v. Browning, 358 So.2d 253 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978).

AFFIRMED but REMANDED for the entry of a new cost order which excludes the costs of copies of depositions.

GRIMES, Acting C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DAVIS v. MANDAU
(Jul 1, 1981)