Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ANDRE J. HAYNIE.

[EDITORS' NOTE: MAJORITY OPINION TEXT CAN BE FOUND AT 395 So.2d 669.]

[2] DENNIS, Justice, concurring.

I respectfully concur, La., 395 So.2d 669. I believe the arrest warrant was invalid because probable cause was not shown in the warrant application, which under our state constitution should be subject to the same rules as those pertaining to search warrants. Without a valid arrest warrant, the seizure of the defendant in a private residence was illegal under the dictates of Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980). The confession taken thereafter should be suppressed as the fruit of this illegal seizure.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. HAYNIE
(Aug 4, 1981)