Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ROOSEVELT SMITH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Roosevelt Smith appeals a condition of his probation requiring him to pay court costs, contending that the trial court erred in setting an amount of $300 over his objection without any determination of the actual costs incurred. We interpret Section 27.56, Florida Statutes (1979), to require that costs imposed be shown to be the actual costs, rather than set at an arbitrary figure. Accordingly, this condition of Smith's probation is set aside pending remand of the cause for a hearing to determine the actual amount of costs incurred.

BOOTH, SHAW and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. STATE
(Aug 11, 1981)