Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PAUL E. SCOTT, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. BILL MOORE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL # 870, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, ETC., AFL-CIO, LOCAL 450, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Opinion March 26, 1981, 5 Cir., 1981, 640 F.2d 708).

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCOTT v. MOORE
(Aug 31, 1981)