Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MILLS v. THE STATE.

QUILLIAN, Chief Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for entering an automobile with intent to commit a theft. Code Ann. § 26-1813.1 (Ga. L. 1976, pp. 186, 187). Held:

1. Applying the standard prescribed by Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560), the evidence, although circumstantial, was sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

2. The defendant contends when the jury was polled that one of the jurors expressed such uncertainty as to her verdict so as to require the grant of defendant's motion for mistrial. An examination of the transcript regarding what transpired concerning the poll of the juror in question reveals that the juror assented to the verdict of guilty both in the jury room and at the time she was polled. See in this connection Person v. State, 235 Ga. 814, 816 (4) ( 221 S.E.2d 587) and Young v. State, 239 Ga. 53, 60 ( 236 S.E.2d 1).

Moreover, as was held in Macon R. Light Co. v. Barnes, 121 Ga. 443, 449 ( 49 S.E. 282) where it was contended that a juror did not assent to the verdict: ". . . a motion for a mistrial was not the appropriate remedy, and the court did not err in not granting it. The proper motion would have been, that the verdict be not received and the jury be directed to retire to their room for further deliberation on the case."

No reversible error appears from the trial judge's ruling.

Judgment affirmed. McMurray, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

DECIDED OCTOBER 14, 1981.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MILLS v. STATE
(Oct 14, 1981)