AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROOSEVELT MAYS, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Tsoucalas, J.), rendered September 5, 1978, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and criminal possession of stolen property in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The facts have been considered and are determined to have been established. The Trial Justice's charge regarding defendant's alibi defense essentially follows the language that we have repeatedly held to constitute reversible error. (See People v. Bauer, 83 A.D.2d 869, and the cases cited therein.) Inasmuch as a new trial is mandated, we note that under the circumstances of this case, Police Officer Esty's testimony that Ettora Romano had identified defendant constituted inadmissible hearsay and should have been excluded. (See People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471, 477.) Mangano, J.P., O'Connor, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MAYS
(Oct 13, 1981)