Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY vs. STATE PARK INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.

Because count four of the plaintiff's complaint was brought pursuant to G.L.c. 93A, § 11, there was no requirement of a thirty-day demand letter as required by G.L.c. 93A, § 9, Nader v. Citron, 372 Mass. 96, 99-101 (1977), and the judge committed error in dismissing count four. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Superior Court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

So ordered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

AETNA CASUALTY SURETY v. STATE PARK INS. A
(Dec 8, 1981)