AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

FRANKLIN COBBS et al., Respondents v. LEFRAK ORGANIZATION, INC., Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for false arrest, assault and malicious prosecution, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.), dated May 19, 1981, which denied, as moot, its motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint within 20 days after a demand was made (see CPLR 3012, subd [b]). Order reversed on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and defendant's motion to dismiss is granted. A plaintiff who seeks to serve a complaint, where a demand has been made, after expiration of the 20-day statutory period specified in CPLR 3012 (subd [b]), must (1) demonstrate that there was a reasonable excuse for the delay, and (2) make a prima facie showing of legal merit. (See Barasch v Micucci, 49 N.Y.2d 594; Bruno v Village of Port Chester, 77 A.D.2d 580.) Plaintiffs have offered no excuse for their delay, and have set forth insufficient evidentiary facts to establish a prima facie showing of legal merit. Special Term improperly denied defendant's motion to dismiss (see Verre v Rosas, 47 N.Y.2d 795). Mollen, P.J., Gulotta, Weinstein and Thompson, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COBBS v. LEFRAK ORGANIZATION, INC
(Dec 14, 1981)