Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THOMAS ZARCONE, Appellant, v. WILLIAM M. PERRY et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice JAMES D. HOPKINS at the Appellate Division ( 78 A.D.2d 70), insofar as the result is based upon the principles of res judicata and collateral estoppel. However, we express no view regarding the applicability of the rule prohibiting double recovery, as we conclude that it is unnecessary to reach that issue.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ZARCONE v. PERRY
(Dec 17, 1981)