Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

LUMPKIN v. THE STATE.

SHULMAN, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of burglary and one count of theft by receiving stolen property. He raises four enumerations of error, three of which take issue with the jury charge and a ruling of the trial court. The fourth enumeration involves the denial of appellant's motion for a new trial, which motion was based upon the errors alleged in the first three enumerations. Inasmuch as appellant made no objection during the trial to any of the purported errors now enumerated and since he did not reserve his right to later object to the jury charge, he has waived his right to raise these issues on appeal. Jackson v. State, 246 Ga. 459, 460 ( 271 S.E.2d 855); McAllister v. State, 231 Ga. 368 (1) ( 202 S.E.2d 54). It follows that it was not error to deny appellant's motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed. Birdsong and Sognier, JJ., concur.

DECIDED JANUARY 12, 1982 — REHEARING DENIED JANUARY 25, 1982 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LUMPKIN v. STATE
(Jan 12, 1982)