Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEONARD M. GUIDO, Appellant

MEMORANDUM.

Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed and fine remitted.

We are in agreement with the position adopted by the court in the case of People v Bromley ( 85 Misc.2d 988, 990) to the effect that section 210.45 Penal of the Penal Law is only applicable to situations where a specific authorization exists for the use of an affirmation in place of a notarized form (see, also, 3 CJI, p 1538). In the case at bar, we find no specific statute authorizing the use of the form notice. Accordingly, the judgment of conviction should be reversed. We are mindful of the case of People v Joseph ( 173 Misc. 410) construing the predecessor statute to section 210.45 Penal of the Penal Law. To the extent that said case indicates views contrary to the one adopted herein, we decline to follow it.

FARLEY, P.J., GEILER and DIPAOLA, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. GUIDO
(Feb 8, 1982)