Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARIO MANDRACHIO, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the police failed to scrupulously honor his right to remain silent was not raised in the trial court and thus has not been preserved for review. Nor in the context of this record can it be said, as a matter of law, that the prosecutor should have interpreted the defendant's remark that he could not afford an attorney as a request for assigned counsel. Significantly the defendant himself did not suggest that his comment should be so construed until the case was on appeal.

We have considered the defendant's other contentions and have found them to be without merit.

Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG concur; Judge MEYER concurs in result only; Chief Judge COOKE dissents and votes to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Justice JOHN CARRO at the Appellate Division ( 79 A.D.2d 278, 284-286); Judge JONES taking no part.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MANDRACHIO
(Feb 9, 1982)