Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

LINDA R. PUGACH, Appellant, v. LIGGETT GROUP, INC., et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM.

The order should be affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division. We would only add that this court has held subdivision 21 of section 292 of the Executive Law, as it existed prior to July 10, 1979, applicable to discharges of employees as well as to refusals to hire job applicants (e.g., City of New York v Cole, 48 N.Y.2d 707; Matter of State Div. of Human Rights v Averill Park Cent. School Dist., 46 N.Y.2d 950).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PUGACH v. LIGGETT GROUP, INC
(Feb 11, 1982)