AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of DOHERTY'S NEW DORP TAVERN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE LIQUOR AUTHORITY et al., Appellants.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), judgment affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 82 A.D.2d 858). The finding of the State Liquor Authority that the bouncer overreacted in forcibly ejecting a patron from the licensed premises, without more, is insufficient to sustain the charge. (See Matter of L.B.R. Enterprises v New York State Liq. Auth., 53 N.Y.2d 714).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF DOHERTY'S NEW DORP v. N.Y. STATE LIQ. AUTH
(Feb 23, 1982)