AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PHOENIX APARTMENTS, INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, AND PHOENIXASSOCIATES, LTD., A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. EDGEWATER PARK SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, A BODY POLITICOF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT AND THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment below substantially on the basis of so much of the majority opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 178 N.J. Super. 109 (1981), as determines the validity of the classification of rate schedule. In so doing, we intimate no view on the admissibility of the rent rolls under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, Evid. R. 63(13).

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PHOENIX APTS., INC. v. EDGEWATER PARK SEWERAGE AUTH
(Feb 24, 1982)