Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

PHIL MECHANIC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. AND JOHN.E. SHACKELFORD, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE v. CONRAD HAYWOOD AND GENEVA HAYWOOD

Courts 6 — appeal to superior court from clerk — failure to perfect appeal in time The superior court had no jurisdiction to review an order of the clerk denying a request for a foreclosure sale of property securing a deed of trust where petitioners failed to perfect their appeal by giving notice of appeal within ten days after entry of the order as required by G.S. 1-272.

A special proceeding was instituted by petitioners on 13 March 1980 to foreclose on a deed of trust. A hearing was conducted by the Clerk of Superior Court of Rutherford County on 3 April 1980, at which time the request of petitioners for sale by foreclosure was denied. Petitioners gave notice of appeal to the Superior Court on 15 April 1980. The matter was placed on the Superior Court calendar for the September 1980 and 12 January sessions of court, but neither the petitioners nor their representative appeared in court at either session. The appeal was dismissed by order dated 20 January 1981 for failure of the petitioners to appear and prosecute. Petitioners appeal from the order.

MORRIS, Chief Judge.

Petitioners cite authority for the proposition that the court erred in its dismissal of the proceeding for failure to prosecute, because there was no finding that petitioners engaged in delay tactics. They also contend that the court improperly dismissed the action on its own motion, and note that there is no indication in the order of the Superior Court with respect to whether the case was ever reached for hearing.

We deem it unnecessary to speak to the issues of deliberateness of delay, the source of the motion to dismiss, or whether the matter came to be heard, as petitioners failed to perfect their appeal from the order of the Clerk by giving notice of appeal to the Superior Court within ten days of the entry of the order as required by G.S. 1-272. The court was, therefore, without jurisdiction to review the ruling. Spaulding Division of Questors Corp. v. DuBose, 46 N.C. App. 612, 265 S.E.2d 501, cert. denied, 300 N.C. 375, 267 S.E.2d 678 (1980).

Vacated and remanded for entry of an order of dismissal.

Judges HEDRICK and MARTIN (Robert M.) concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MECHANIC CONSTRUCTION CO. v. HAYWOOD
(Mar 1, 1982)