Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

GORDON BEH, Appellant, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent. (Claim No. 60990.)

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims should be reinstated, for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum at the Appellate Division.

The trial court "by necessary implication from its award of consequential damages" found the loss of direct access rendered the property unsuitable for its highest and best use ( Priestly v State of New York, 23 N.Y.2d 152, 155).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur; Judge JASEN dissents and votes to affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division ( 81 A.D.2d 744).

Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed, with costs, and the judgment of the Court of Claims reinstated in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BEH v. STATE OF NEW YORK
(Mar 30, 1982)