Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. DANIEL M. HOWE, Respondent.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, judgment of conviction reinstated and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. That court may, in the exercise of its exclusive interests of justice review power, consider any other fact questions concerning the plea, if any (CPL 470.25, subd 2, par [d]; 470.40, subd 2, par [b]). By his plea of guilty defendant forfeited his claim to dismissal of the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30 ( People v Friscia, 51 N.Y.2d 845). The Appellate Division determination that defendant reserved his CPL 30.30 claim is not supported by the record. We note that any attempt to do so would have been ineffectual (cf. People v Thomas, 74 A.D.2d 317, affd 53 N.Y.2d 338).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. HOWE
(Apr 6, 1982)