Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

McINTYRE, Respondent on Re v. ew,

TANZER, J.

Reversed.

TANZER, J.

This is a post-decree garnishment proceeding in a dissolution suit. The trial court allowed a continuing garnishment against defendant's workers' compensation benefits in the hands of the insurer. The Court of Appeals modified.

The issues in this case are identical to those presented in the case of Satterfield v. Satterfield, 292 Or. 780, 643 P.2d 336 (1982) (decided this date). Our decision in this case is based upon the reasons expressed in our opinion in Satterfield.

The Court of Appeals allowance of the garnishment is reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

McINTYRE v. WRIGHT
(Apr 6, 1982)