AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

HAZEL KEEN, Respondent, v. INVESTORS DATA TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In an action, inter alia, to compel the corporate defendant to transfer shares of stock to plaintiff, the corporate defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered May 6, 1980, as granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and denied its cross motion to dismiss the complaint. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting from the second decretal paragraph thereof the words "or her designees". As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. Special Term erred in affording relief to plaintiff's designees inasmuch as only the transfer of stock to plaintiff was in issue. With regard to whether plaintiff complied with the requirements listed on the legend of the appellant's stock certificates, we find that this issue was not raised at Special Term. Accordingly, appellant waived the right to have such issue reviewed on appeal ( Brown v Kimmel, 68 A.D.2d 896, 897; Marine Midland Bank-Cent. v. Gleason, 62 A.D.2d 429, 437). Weinstein, J.P., Thompson, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KEEN v. INVESTORS DATA TECHNOLOGY, INC
(Apr 5, 1982)