Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELLIS RUBIN, PETITIONER, v. DADE COUNTY, RESPONDENT.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

The petitioner Rubin, an attorney, represented without fee an indigent named Layfield, who was charged with first degree murder. The trial court declared Layfield indigent for costs with a cap of $750.00. Rubin expended a sum in excess of that amount before Layfield pled guilty to second degree murder and aggravated battery in September, 1979. Rubin did not move for an order of reimbursement, however, until April, 1981. In the order now under review, the trial court denied the application on the sole ground that it was untimely filed. We treat the present appeal as a petition for certiorari and quash the order below.

Although Rubin paid over $1,400.00 in costs he now claims entitlement only to the $750.00 authorized by the court.

See Daniel v. State, 309 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).

In the total absence of a showing that the appellee Dade County, which is ultimately responsible for the costs, has been prejudiced or its interests adversely affected in any way by the passage of time, a mere, thus-irrelevant delay in seeking payment affords no reason for denying Rubin the relief to which he became entitled by order of court. See Roberts v. Askew, 260 So.2d 492, 494 (Fla. 1972); City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So.2d 5, 14 (Fla. 1958). For this reason, the trial court is directed to enter an order certifying that $750.00 should be paid to Rubin as taxable costs.

Certiorari granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUBIN v. DADE COUNTY
(Apr 27, 1982)