Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WOOD et al. v. COLE.

PER CURIAM.

It is undisputed that the issues raised in this appeal are moot. While we agree with appellants' argument that there are issues "capable of repetition yet evading review" (see Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 373 ( 99 S.C. 2898, 61 L.Ed.2d 608) (1979), we also find that the record in this case is such that we are unable to adequately consider the issues.

It is therefore the judgment of this court that the case be dismissed as moot.

Appeal dismissed. All the Justices concur, except Weltner, J., who is disqualified.

PER CURIAM.

DECIDED APRIL 29, 1982 — REHEARING DENIED MAY 18, 1982.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOOD v. COLE
(Apr 29, 1982)