Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

KATHY WILNO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCECOMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Allcorn, reported at 180 N.J. Super. 146, 152 (1981).

PASHMAN, HANDLER and O'HERN, JJ., dissenting:

We would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the majority of that court, reported at 180 N.J. Super. 146 (1981).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER and POLLOCK — 4.

For affirmance — Justices PASHMAN, HANDLER and O'HERN — 3.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILNO v. N.J. MFRS. INS. CO
(May 13, 1982)