Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Jeffrey J. Chornoboy argued the cause for appellants ( D'Alessandro, Sussman, Jacovino Dowd, attorneys; Shannon Z. Taylor, on the brief). Emerald L. Erickson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Cole, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Emerald L. Erickson, on the brief). Phyllis G. Warren, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for amicus curiae Office of the Public Defender ( Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; T. Gary Mitchell, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel; Phyllis G. Warren and T. Gary Mitchell, on the brief).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Jeffrey J. Chornoboy argued the cause for appellants ( D'Alessandro, Sussman, Jacovino Dowd, attorneys; Shannon Z. Taylor, on the brief). Emerald L. Erickson, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents ( Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Michael R. Cole, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Emerald L. Erickson, on the brief). Phyllis G. Warren, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for amicus curiae Office of the Public Defender ( Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney; T. Gary Mitchell, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, of counsel; Phyllis G. Warren and T. Gary Mitchell, on the brief).
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

JANE DOE (A FICTITIOUS NAME) A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM,MARTHA FISHER AND MARTHA FISHER, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. NEWJERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OFINSTITUTIONS AND AGENCIES, HAROLD WELLS, RICHARD ZIEGLER AND JAMES OLIPHANT,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the dissenting opinion of Judge Pressler, reported at 178 N.J. Super. 499, 504 (1981).

For reversal — Chief Justice WILENTZ, and Justices PASHMAN, CLIFFORD, SCHREIBER, HANDLER, POLLOCK and O'HERN — 7.

For affirmance — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

DOE v. YOUTH FAMILY SERVICES DIV
(May 11, 1982)