AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLARENCE JONES, APPELLANT, v. THE FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE.

MILLS, Judge.

Jones appeals contending the Parole and Probation Commission improperly calculated his presumptive parole release date (PPRD). We agree in part and disagree in part.

We find no error in the Commission relying on presentence investigation reports, or Florida Department of Law Enforcement reports, or FBI records to establish prior convictions.

The record reveals that Jones' sentence for possession of controlled substance paraphernalia (A #) had expired prior to the imposition of a sentence for possession of cocaine and heroin. It was, therefore, improper for the Commission to aggregate his A # commitment with his other commitments. Florida Administrative Code, Rule 23-19.02(2)(g).

The order is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions that Jones' PPRD be calculated in a manner consistent with this opinion.

LARRY G. SMITH and SHAW, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JONES v. FLORIDA PAROLE PROBATION
(May 12, 1982)