Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PETITIONER, v. HONORABLE JAMES O. ELLISON, RESPONDENT.

The Court, sitting en banc, having heard oral argument of counsel, orders as follows:

1. The petitioner's emergency application for writ of mandamus and appeal is hereby denied.

2. The petitioner's emergency motion for stay of the district court's order of dismissal of Counts 1 through 15 of the Indictment is denied.

3. The order of the panel entered in the captioned cause on May 17, 1982, 684 F.2d 664, staying all further proceedings before the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in case No. 81-CR-97, United States of America v. Robert B. Sutton, et al., is hereby vacated.

The Court is of the view that mandamus is an inappropriate remedy and that to grant the relief prayed for would violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution.

BARRETT and DOYLE, Circuit Judges, dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. ELLISON
(May 21, 1982)