Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

JAMES R. GOHERY, Appellant, v. SPARTAN CONCRETE CORP., Defendant, and TILLES INVESTMENT CORPORATION et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said, as a matter of law, that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in granting defendants-respondents' motions to dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3216 (see Levin v 40 Realty, 80 A.D.2d 515, affd 54 N.Y.2d 624; Sortino v Fisher, 20 A.D.2d 25).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOHERY v. SPARTAN CONCRETE CORP
(May 20, 1982)