Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES HARRY TOBIN, APPELLANT, v. B.A. GREADINGTON, CHAIRPERSON, FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

At the time appellant sought review of his presumptive parole release date in the circuit court, this court's decision in Daniels v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 401 So.2d 1351 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), had not been rendered. Appellant properly filed with the circuit court a petition for writ of mandamus, pursuant to the Florida Supreme Court's decision in Moore v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 289 So.2d 719 (Fla. 1974). There is no time limit on filing of petitions for extraordinary writs, the only requirement being that petitioner exhaust his administrative remedies prior to invoking the jurisdiction of the circuit court. Review of final agency action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission was not clearly available under Rule 9.110, Fla.R.App.P., until our decision in Daniels, supra.

Therefore, we reverse and remand to the Circuit Court for the Eighth Judicial Circuit for consideration of the petition on its merits.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD and BOOTH, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOBIN v. GREADINGTON
(May 21, 1982)