Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

May Helen Woody, Petitioner v. Commonwealth of Pennsyl

Public assistance — Uniform purchase — Timeliness of request.

1. One-time public assistance grants to purchase uniforms required in a new job are not properly limited to requests made prior to the commencement of such employment. [631]

OPINION BY JUDGE CRAIG, May 27, 1982:

Claimant May Helen Woody appeals from an order of the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) affirming the decision of the Allegheny County Board of Assistance (CBA) which denied claimant's request for a one-time grant to cover the purchase of white uniforms and shoes required for her new food service job.

Public Assistance Eligibility Manual, Section 175.23(c)(2), 55 Pa. Code § 175.23(c)(2), provides:

(2) Nonrecurring one-time grant. A nonrecurring one-time grant may be authorized for an allowance to meet the actual minimum cost, subject to the specified maximum allowances, for any of the following items provided an individual shows that these items are needed in order to apply for or to accept employment or training which will result in decreasing or preventing his need for assistance. The individual must provide proof that he has an offer of a job, referral to a job or training program, or that he has been scheduled for admission to an examination, such as a Civil Service test or a high school equivalency test. The eligible items are as follows:

. . . .
(B) Uniforms or special clothes such as white hose, shoes, slip, trousers, jacket or shirt, hair net, workshoes, trousers or shirt.



DPW denied the request because it was not made until after the claimant had started her employment.

The DPW decision is contrary to our holding in Rodgers v. Department of Public Welfare, 45 Pa. Commw. 574, 576, 405 A.2d 1068, 1069 (1979), that such one-time grants should not be limited to requests that are made before the commencement of training or employment. In accord are Bittner v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commw. 396, 400, 413 A.2d 20, 22 (1980) and Chase v. Department of Public Welfare, 46 Pa. Commw. 308, 311, 406 A.2d 261, 262 (1979).

Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the DPW.

ORDER

NOW, May 27, 1982, the order of the Department of Public Welfare, dated March 3, 1980, denying May Helen Woody a one-time non-recurring grant, is reversed, and this case is remanded with a direction for payment of the one-time grant requested.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOODY v. DEPT. of PUBLIC WELFARE
(May 27, 1982)