Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN R. DE VITO, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Although it was inappropriate for the trial court to address counsel as it did in the presence of the jury, it was not error for the court to prevent counsel from cross-examining the witness concerning the possibility of her receiving a life sentence, a risk to which the defendant was also exposed.

No door had been opened to this inquiry and it was not necessary to specify the potential sentence in order to explain to the jury the extent of the arrangement the witness had made with the prosecutor for a grant of immunity ( People v Roth, 30 N.Y.2d 99).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DE VITO
(Jun 8, 1982)