Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of BERNICE LEVYN, Appellant, v. GORDON M. AMBACH, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order affirmed, with costs. The commissioner is empowered to substitute his judgment of the proper penalty for that of the hearing panel whose action he was reviewing ( Matter of Shurgin v Ambach, 56 N.Y.2d 700). In fixing dismissal as the appropriate penalty, his decision to disregard the testimony of petitioner's psychiatrist was not arbitrary or capricious, inasmuch as the psychiatrist had commenced treatment after the events in question and had refused to express any opinion as to petitioner's functions as a teacher.

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF LEVYN v. AMBACH
(Jun 15, 1982)