Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Francis J. CAIN, Appellant.

AMDAHL, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Francis J. Cain from an order of the Ramsey County District Court denying his petition for postconviction relief in the form of resentencing according to the Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 3 (Supp. 1981). We affirm.

Petitioner, who is 32, seeks resentencing in connection with two 1979 convictions of burglary, for which he received concurrent 5-year prison terms. It is not clear from the file what petitioner's current target release date is. At the time of the postconviction hearing the district court was informed that petitioner's expected release date was February 26, 1983, and his sentence expiration date was August 26, 1983.

Petitioner's criminal history score at the time of sentencing in 1979 would have been three. The burglary offenses are severity level IV offenses. The presumptive sentence for a severity level IV offense by one with a criminal history score of three is 21 months stayed. If petitioner were resentenced to concurrent 21-month stayed terms, he would be entitled to immediate release from prison.

Given petitioner's record of recidivism and his chemical dependency problem, we conclude that the district court properly refused to resentence petitioner according to the Sentencing Guidelines. State v. Champion, 319 N.W.2d 21 (Minn. 1982).

Petitioner remains subject to the jurisdiction of the Minnesota Corrections Board or its successor.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CAIN
(Jul 14, 1982)