Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

HARVEY FRANKLIN BOYD v. STATE OF MARYLAND

CRIMINAL LAW — Interstate Agreement On Detainers — Dismissal Requirement Of Detainer Act Did Not Apply To Instant Case As Indictment Was Not One Contemplated By § 616 E (e) — Maryland Code, Article 27, § 616 E (Article IV Of The Interstate Agreement On Detainers).

PER CURIAM:

The petition for writ of certiorari filed in this case by Harvey Franklin Boyd presented the following question: "Did the Court of Special Appeals err in holding that the dismissal requirement of Article 27, § 616 E (Article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers) did not apply to the instant case because the instant indictment was not one contemplated by § 616 E (e)?"

The petition having been granted, the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals in Boyd v. State, 51 Md. App. 197, 441 A.2d 1133 (1982) is affirmed for the reasons set forth in the opinion of that Court.

Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed.

Costs to be paid by the petitioner.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOYD v. STATE
(Jul 27, 1982)