Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Bruce SHERROD v. STATE of Arkansas

1. APPEAL ERROR — BELATED BRIEF — DENIAL OF EXTENSION OF FILING TIME. — Where appellant was permitted to proceed pro se on appeal, was notified of the date when his brief was due, was twice notified, after he failed to file a brief, of the need to file a motion for permission to file a belated brief which was never filed, appellant's motion to an extension of time to file a belated brief, which was not supported by good cause, was denied. 2. APPEAL ERROR — WAIVER OF RIGHT OF APPEAL. — Appellants failure to file a brief and his inexcusable delay in filing a motion to file a belated brief must be considered a waiver of his right to appeal.

PER CURIAM.

On May 24, 1982, we granted the appellant Bruce Sherrod permission to proceed pro se on appeal. Sherrod was notified that the appellant's brief was due July 3. When no brief was filed by that date, appellant was twice notified of the need to file a motion for permission to file a belated brief. He did not file the motion. On September 9, the State filed the motion to dismiss appeal which is now before us. Appellant responded with a motion for extension of time to file a belated brief. We find no good cause in appellant's motion for his delay.

The motion to dismiss appeal is granted. Appellant has been afforded every opportunity to file his brief. His failure to file a brief and his inexcusable delay in filing a motion to file a belated brief must be considered a waiver of his right to appeal.

Motion granted.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SHERROD v. STATE
(Oct 4, 1982)