AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

FEDDERS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

All of the findings of fact appearing in the written opinion of the judge of the tax court, 3 N.J. Tax 576 (Tax Ct. 1981), including those which were derived by inference from the stipulation of facts and documentary exhibits as well as those here challenged on appeal as matters of law and thus said to be beyond the determination of the trial judge as a matter of fact, might reasonably have been reached upon the record in the tax court and we will not disturb them. Mayflower Securities v. Bureau of Securities, 64 N.J. 85 , 312 A.2d 497 (1973). The conclusions of law applied to these findings are sound.

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by Judge Andrew.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FEDDERS FINANCIAL CORP. v. DIRECTOR, DIVISION OF TAX
(Oct 6, 1982)