ARBITRON CO. v. FALLS BROADCASTING CORP

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 80-1624.

Attorney(S)

For the defendant-petitioner there was a brief (in court of appeals) and oral argument by Harvey Goldstein, Milwaukee. For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief (in court of appeals) by Jordan B. Reich and Kohner, Mann Kailas, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Reich.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 80-1624.

Attorney(S)

For the defendant-petitioner there was a brief (in court of appeals) and oral argument by Harvey Goldstein, Milwaukee. For the plaintiff-respondent there was a brief (in court of appeals) by Jordan B. Reich and Kohner, Mann Kailas, S.C., Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Reich.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

ARBITRON COMPANY DIVISION OF CONTROL DATA CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FALLS BROADCASTING CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, d/b/a WZMF Radio, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

(Dismissing petition to review of 103 Wis.2d 693, 310 N.W.2d 653 [Ct App Table].)

PER CURIAM.

We conclude the petition for review should be dismissed. After full examination of the record and the briefs of the parties, and after hearing oral argument, we conclude that the case does not present the legal issues concerning modification and termination of contracts that the court anticipated when it granted the petition for review.

We conclude that the petition for review was improvidently granted.

The petition for review is dismissed.

BEILFUSS, C.J., took no part.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

ARBITRON COMPANY DIVISION OF CONTROL DATA CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. FALLS BROADCASTING CORPORATION, a Wisconsin corporation, d/b/a WZMF Radio, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner.

Comments