Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

APPEAL OF STANLEY ROKETENETZ, JR. (New Hampshire Board of Taxation)

Taxation — Appeals — Time Where taxpayer filed a request with his town selectmen for an abatement of his property tax, which was never acted upon, his appeal to the board of taxation was properly dismissed as untimely where the appeal was filed six months and five days after the date he received the property tax bill. RSA 76:16-a I (Supp. 1981).

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The taxpayer received a property tax bill for his real estate in Pelham on November 21, 1980, and on February 6, 1981, he filed a request with his town selectmen for an abatement. Unfortunately and regrettably, as often occurs, the selectmen never acted upon the request and, therefore, on May 26, 1981, the taxpayer appealed to the board of taxation. The appeal was dismissed for failure to comply with the terms of RSA 76:16-a I (Supp. 1981). That statute requires that, if the selectmen "neglect or refuse" to abate the tax, an appeal must be taken to the board of taxation within six months after the date of "notice of such tax."

Even though the notice of appeal to the board of taxation was filed only five days late, this court has previously held that six months means six months, Arlington Am. Sample Book Co. v. Board of Taxation, 116 N.H. 575, 576, 364 A.2d 878, 879 (1976), and we see no reason to overrule that case. The case of Appeal of Wood Flour, Inc., 121 N.H. 991, 437 A.2d 286 (1981), is clearly inapposite.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

APPEAL OF ROKETENETZ
(Oct 12, 1982)