Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Advocates

HALLDOR GUDMUNDSON et al., Appellants, v. EDWARD H. AXELROD, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, with costs, and defendant's motion for summary judgment denied. Questions of fact exist as to when plaintiff's treatment was "completed" and as to whether the August 29, 1974 visit was a timely return visit within the scope of the continuous treatment doctrine enunciated in McDermott v Torre ( 56 N.Y.2d 399).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GUDMUNDSON v. AXELROD
(Oct 21, 1982)