Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

IN RE CONTEMPT OF JAMES P. MILLER. STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. JAMES P. MILLER, APPELLANT.

Contempt: Attorneys at Law. A finding that an attorney's failure to appear in court at an appointed time was not willful constitutes a finding that the failure to appear was not contempt of court.

PER CURIAM.

According to our previous definition of contempt advanced by this court in In re Contempt of Potter, 207 Neb. 769, 301 N.W.2d 560 (1981), a finding must be made that an attorney's failure to appear at a designated time was willful in order to hold him or her in contempt. In the instant case the trial court found that the failure to appear was not willful behavior on the part of the appellant. Therefore, the trial court was not justified in holding the appellant in contempt of court. The judgment of the trial court is in all respects reversed.

REVERSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE CONTEMPT OF MILLER
(Nov 24, 1982)